i'm posting a myspace message thread. actually, it was in response to a bulletin. the person who posted the bulletin, was on my friends list. let's call them "billary." billary posted a bulletin with the title: "mr.. barack hussein obama"... the contents of the bulletin was this photo:
i responded with the following message...
----------------- Original Message -----------------
From: shawnavery
Date: Feb 25, 2008 3:05 PM
mrs. hillary clinton... mr. george bush... mr. bill clinton...
SAD. very very SAD.
hillary and bill... and dubya... non of them were doing anything wrong either... just seeking a photo op. but obama, actually HAS somalian heritage. is that a BAD thing?
what about the fact that somalia is a largely christian nation, with muslims amounting to about 10 percent of the population?
most people sling mud when they are about to lose. HRC is using smear again, just like she's always done.
s.
----------------- Original Message -----------------
From: shawnavery
Date: Feb 25, 2008 3:05 PM
mrs. hillary clinton... mr. george bush... mr. bill clinton...
SAD. very very SAD.
hillary and bill... and dubya... non of them were doing anything wrong either... just seeking a photo op. but obama, actually HAS somalian heritage. is that a BAD thing?
what about the fact that somalia is a largely christian nation, with muslims amounting to about 10 percent of the population?
most people sling mud when they are about to lose. HRC is using smear again, just like she's always done.
s.
billary's response:
----------------- Original Message -----------------
From: billary
Date: Feb 25, 2008 3:20 PM
i don't think there is anything wrong with it at all--kudos to barack, hillary, bill, ronald, george, etc. i simply posted a photo and his full name. last i checked that wouldn't fall into the category of "mud slinging. "
my response:
----------------- Original Message -----------------
From: shawnavery
Date: Feb 25, 2008 3:28 PM
of course not. hiding behind the convenient shield of innuendo... resting all implications on the viewer.
while sitting back and then saying... "oh my goodness... we don't see anything wrong with this either. poor fellow!"
hitler did the same thing before burning down the reitzstag in berlin.
its actually worse than a usual smear campaign, because you are manipulating the viewer through implication as well. nasty nasty stuff. not a good way to promote truth.
you've been deleted.
s.
billary's response:
----------------- Original Message -----------------
From: billary
Date: Feb 25, 2008 3:44 PM
i can't help the fact you felt the need to defend him when you saw that photo. i've sen. obama, i've made financial contributions to his campaign as well as sen. clintons. he will have my vote if me manages to make the democratic nomination.
i was just eager to see how many of his supporters felt the impulsion to defend that picture. there is no way i would ever feel the need to defend hillary wearing that... but, then again i opted to support someone who is safely entrenched behind undeniable facts.
my response:
----------------- Original Message -----------------
From: shawnavery
Date: Feb 25, 2008 3:50 PM
wow.
ok, i'm going to softly, step away from this conversation.
you are delusional. very delusional.
you posted the photo with obama's name to specifically ellicit a response. maybe not a negative or defensive response. the viewer... as much as you are heaping innuendo upon them... still has the baseline understanding that YOU are wanting a response. or worse... you are wanting to shape perception by implication.
any way you try to shadow box around it... its still bullshit.
vote for whomever... that's not my concern.
and i can assure you... that hillary clinton is NOT safely entrenched in the facts. she has stretched and manipulated her record more than anyone else in this campaign.
and at he very least... she wants to be chief executive, but she can't run a unified campaign, her sense of entitlement led her to think that she wouldn't need money after feb 5th... silly
she is accusing obama of multiple crimes that she has done herself. like obama said... it is silly season in politics.
her iraq policy is skewed, she couldn't get healthcare reform the first time around... and even the court appointees she coddled couldn't make it through. what exactly CAN she get passed?
like i said...
SAD.
billary's final response:
----------------- Original Message -----------------
From: billary
Date: Feb 25, 2008 4:05 PM
you're right.
it was bullshit for me to post that photo--i deleted the bulletin.
i honestly was messing around with some of my close friends who are constantly posting anti-hillary bulletins, messages and comments on my page. i should have considered there would be people like yourself that wouldn't realize where i stand or what my intention really was. for that, i extend to you my apologies.
i should post more of this stuff. i never lose. although i did forget to mention one thing... that her implications were also grossly ethnocentric.